- Pin
- #Over 100 Companies Hold Over 830,000 BTC#
According to reports as of June 19, more than 100 companies collectively hold over 830,000 BTC, worth about $86.476 billion.
💬 Do you think Bitcoin will become a new norm for corporate asset allocation? How might this impact Bitcoin’s price? What’s your recent BTC trading strategy? Post to share your price predictions, market analysis, and strategies with us using the topic tag!
🎁 Meanwhile, Gate’s BTC Staking event is in full swing! Simply stake your BTC and earn up to 3% APY. Click the link to start staking and enjoy your earnings: https://ww - 🏁 Gate Red Bull Racing Tour 2025 In Full Swing!
Up to now, the total trading volume exceeded $2 billion, with top trader trading volume nearing $200 million
Join the race now & fuel your trades for real-world rewards:
✅ 5,000 GT Prize Pool
✅ VIP Seat at an F1 Grand Prix
✅ Futures Vouchers for New Signups
Start your engines & trade fast
Top the leaderboards. The Race is ON!
👉 Go Now: www.gate.com/competition/f1rb/s1
#GateRedBullRacingTour# - 📢 Gate releases its latest Reserve Audit Report!
💰 Total reserves: $10.453B
🟢 Excess reserves: $1.96B — ensuring full coverage and extra security for user assets.
Gate continues to uphold 100% proof-of-reserves and full transparency.
🔗 Read the full report: https://www.gate.com/zh/announcements/article/45617
Chiliz is in a legal dispute with its former Korean employee for failure to pay token compensation
PANews reported on June 26th that a legal dispute occurred between the sports and entertainment public chain Chiliz Chain and its former Korean employee, according to No Cut News. The dispute arose when the former employee sued Chiliz officials on April 19th, claiming that the token compensation promised during their work for the project from 2020 to 2022 was never fulfilled and that they were dismissed for raising this issue. In response, Chiliz filed civil and criminal lawsuits, accusing the former employee of violating confidentiality agreements and spreading false information to the media. The civil lawsuit seeks compensation, while the criminal lawsuit accuses defamation. In April, the former employee lost the compensation case, but the prosecutor dismissed the defamation charge due to insufficient evidence.