Background of the Ripple Lawsuit: The SEC Made a Bid 3 Years Ago!

Ripple Labs' chief legal officer, Stuart Alderoty, has revealed that he rejected a settlement offer from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) three years ago. With this important development, new details of the legal battle of Ripple's XRP token have come to light. Here are the details...

Settlement offer for Ripple

Stuart Alderoty, chief legal officer of Ripple Labs, a well-known blockchain company, recently used X (formerly Twitter) to shed light on an important statement. In a tweet, Alderoty revealed details of an early settlement offer made by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to Ripple three years ago, before legal proceedings were initiated against the blockchain giant and its top executives Brad Garlinghouse and Chris Larsen.

Before the SEC sued Ripple, Chris and Brad (3 yrs ago today) they offered us the following settlement: the SEC would announce to the market that XRP is a security and the market would be given a short window to "come into compliance." We said no because: (1) XRP is not a...

— Stuart Alderoty (@s_alderoty) December 22, 2023

Alderoty's tweet revealed that the SEC proposed a deal to Ripple and its CEO Brad Garlinghouse in 2020. The terms of the proposal included the SEC declaring XRP as a publicly traded security, followed by a short window for the market to 'become compliant'. However, Ripple immediately rejected the offer, citing two important reasons. First, Ripple argued that XRP is not a security, and secondly, Alderoty emphasized that the SEC failed to establish a framework for cryptocurrency compliance.

The legal process has been going on for three years

The legal battle between Ripple and the SEC spanned three years, and the company was determined to prove that XRP was not a security. Alderoty acknowledged that Ripple took significant risks and risked everything to defend its position. Despite the skepticism of many, Ripple managed to expose the SEC as a "hypocritical tyrant" during the courtroom drama. Alderoty stated that this victory allows the U.S. crypto industry to "live to fight another day."

According to Alderoty's statement, in 2020, the SEC filed a settlement proposal against Ripple and its CEO Brad Garlinghouse. Among the terms of the proposal was that the SEC declare XRP a security and provide the market with a "short window to adapt." However, Ripple claimed that this proposal was rejected and that a security of XRP had gained its value, and that the SEC had failed to create a framing for the cryptocurrency's compliance.

Determination that XRP is not a security

It comes at a pivotal time in this landmark case, when federal judge Analisa Torres ruled that XRP sales were not classified as total amount of money sales, and the SEC withdrew personal charges against Chris Larsen and Brad Garlinghouse. While Ripple awaits the final resolution of the case within the next year, Alderoty is concerned about the power of the SEC's over-involvement in other key players in the cryptocurrency market. As the cryptocurrency community keeps a close eye on this personal, the potential implications that could shape the SEC's crypto regulations are eagerly awaited.

According to Alderoty, Ripple has steadfastly pursued the lawsuit despite the high risks and general skepticism. The company's basic budget was to prove that XRP did not actually have a security asset. Alderoty noted the risks in the outcome results and emphasized that Ripple exposed the SEC as a "hypocritical bully" in the court drama. This victory not only proved Ripple right, but also breathed new life into the U.S. cryptocurrency industry.

Follow us on Twitter*, Facebook and Instagram to stay up to date with breaking news. Join our Telegram and Youtube channel.*