Financial Institution customer information leak doubts Official response denies authenticity

robot
Abstract generation in progress

Recently, a report about the leakage of customer information from Financial Institutions has drawn widespread attention in the market. It is reported that someone claimed on a foreign forum that they could sell customer data from multiple Financial Institutions, covering a wide range, including customer information from several banks and insurance companies. The allegedly leaked data includes sensitive personal information such as names, identification numbers, phone numbers, deposit information, and home addresses.

However, the mentioned Financial Institution has already responded to this situation. A relevant person in charge of a certain bank stated that they have verified the so-called "customer information." After comparison, it was found that this so-called customer information does not contain the actual bank account information of the bank, and it does not match the key information of real customers. The bank believes that this information did not originate from an internal leak and is likely to be false information fabricated or pieced together by criminals for illegal gains.

Similarly, other mentioned Financial Institutions have also responded to this event. They all denied the authenticity of these so-called customer information sold on the dark web.

This incident has once again raised people's awareness of personal information security. Although relevant Financial Institutions have denied the possibility of information leakage, they still remind the public to stay vigilant, protect their personal privacy information, and avoid becoming victims of cybercrime. At the same time, this also highlights the important responsibility of Financial Institutions in customer data protection, which needs to be continuously strengthened in information security management to ensure the safety of customer information.

View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
tx_pending_forevervip
· 7h ago
Who wrote this and who believes it?
View OriginalReply0
ProposalManiacvip
· 8h ago
Outdated access control failure cases should be addressed at the internal governance stage.
View OriginalReply0
WinterWarmthCatvip
· 08-09 23:15
Is it really reliable? Don't deceive the common people.
View OriginalReply0
Whale_Whisperervip
· 08-09 23:14
Information forgery? Those who understand, understand!
View OriginalReply0
governance_ghostvip
· 08-09 22:54
Who would believe such a vague response?
View OriginalReply0
ShibaSunglassesvip
· 08-09 22:48
Here comes the hype again, wake up.
View OriginalReply0
MetamaskMechanicvip
· 08-09 22:48
Holding a bunch of melons, talking with a chain.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate app
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)