#Over 100 Companies Hold Over 830,000 BTC#
According to reports as of June 19, more than 100 companies collectively hold over 830,000 BTC, worth about $86.476 billion.
💬 Do you think Bitcoin will become a new norm for corporate asset allocation? How might this impact Bitcoin’s price? What’s your recent BTC trading strategy? Post to share your price predictions, market analysis, and strategies with us using the topic tag!
🎁 Meanwhile, Gate’s BTC Staking event is in full swing! Simply stake your BTC and earn up to 3% APY. Click the link to start staking and enjoy your earnings: https://ww
Google's Quantum: How Willow rewrites blockchain's security rules
This post is a guest contribution by George Siosi Samuels, managing director at Faiā See how Faiā is committed to staying at the forefront of technological advancements here.
Google (NASDAQ: GOOGL) recently announced its Willow quantum computing chip, breaking records by completing tasks in under five minutes—tasks that would require classical supercomputers 10 septillion years. At 105 qubits, Willow surpasses its predecessor, Sycamore, not only in computational speed but notably in stability, reducing errors as qubit numbers increase. For enterprise leaders navigating the intersection of emerging technologies, Willow’s implications stretch beyond mere computational records—they strike at the heart of blockchain security.
Quantum computing’s challenge to blockchain trust
At the core of blockchain security—especially for Bitcoin—is cryptographic certainty. Bitcoin’s security hinges on algorithms like ECDSA, which are traditionally resilient against classical brute-force attacks. But quantum computing, exemplified by Willow, operates fundamentally differently. Qubits exist in multiple states simultaneously, exponentially accelerating complex computations. In practical terms, this means quantum technology could eventually decrypt private keys, dismantling blockchain’s foundational trust.
The immediate risk isn’t a quantum-powered hack tomorrow—it’s the erosion of trust today. Leaders and cybersecurity strategists must anticipate this shift in perception. If stakeholders begin to question the robustness of blockchain cryptography, the ripple effects on adoption and investment could be profound.
Cybersecurity under quantum pressure
Expect to see a strategic recalibration in cybersecurity practices:
BTC vs. BSV: Divergent paths in quantum adaptability
Quantum threats also magnify the existing scalability challenges within blockchain networks. BTC remains encumbered by rigid structures, small block sizes, and inherently slow consensus mechanisms. Its inflexible design is ill-suited to swift, quantum-driven shifts in the technological landscape.
In contrast, BSV, particularly through initiatives like Teranode, positions itself as a scalable, adaptive infrastructure. By supporting near-unlimited block sizes and facilitating millions of transactions per second, BSV isn’t merely addressing today’s scalability requirements—it’s preparing for tomorrow’s quantum contingencies. For enterprise leaders, this distinction is critical:
Navigating the quantum era
Willow’s unveiling by Google is a clear signal. It’s a wake-up call, not a panic button. For enterprise professionals and consultants advising organizations in blockchain and cybersecurity, now is the time to:
The quantum age demands recalibration—not panic. Google’s Willow moves beyond discussions of raw computing power. It’s a signal that the rules of blockchain security are about to evolve significantly. Now’s the time for enterprises to listen closely and respond strategically.
Watch: Want to develop on BSV? Here’s how you can build with Mandala