📢 Exclusive on Gate Square — #PROVE Creative Contest# is Now Live!
CandyDrop × Succinct (PROVE) — Trade to share 200,000 PROVE 👉 https://www.gate.com/announcements/article/46469
Futures Lucky Draw Challenge: Guaranteed 1 PROVE Airdrop per User 👉 https://www.gate.com/announcements/article/46491
🎁 Endless creativity · Rewards keep coming — Post to share 300 PROVE!
📅 Event PeriodAugust 12, 2025, 04:00 – August 17, 2025, 16:00 UTC
📌 How to Participate
1.Publish original content on Gate Square related to PROVE or the above activities (minimum 100 words; any format: analysis, tutorial, creativ
The founder of ElizaOS accuses X of extortion for demanding high licensing fees to unfreeze the account and states that they are considering whether to take legal action.
Odaily News ElizaOS founder Shaw posted on Farcaster stating: "X (Twitter) contacted me, claiming that we violated certain terms of service, including selling data and selling certain content by bypassing the API Secret Key." We have never done this, we did not in the past, and we will never do so in the future. They directly cited my open-source code as the reason for the ban - but that's not even mainly my own code, it's just a patchwork of other open-source projects. They stated that if we pay $50,000 per month for the enterprise license, they will stop the harassment. We currently pay $1,000 per month for Yellow Label certification and $200 per month for developer licensing. Why does switching to a corporate account change my rights to publish open source code? This is blatant extortion and should not be legal. I do not want to be a part of this system; it completely goes against my principles. Considering whether to resort to legal means.